Authorship: how to use authorship roles (contribution disclosure – author(ship) contribution statements)

Authorship 

Recognition for a person's effective contribution to a scholarly publication is done primarily through the inclusion, or not, of the names of (individual) contributors on a (more or less) limited list of names associated with that publication. 

The possibilities for listing authorship contributions in the current system are limited. There is often a lot more involved than the contributions of a few core researchers overseeing the entire ‘project’. Standard practice not always accommodates the various roles/contributions in the creation of a scientific contribution. This tendency is only reinforced by an increase in (large) collaborations, specialization, degree of inter- and transdisciplinary research, etc. 

All this has led to a shift from the static concept of ‘authorship’ to a transparent recognition of the dynamic context in which research takes place and the various roles/contributions that go with it ('contributorship').

 

From ‘authorship’ to ‘contributorship’

Contributorship disclosure explicitly and in detail describes what each author did in the realization of the results and creation of the scholarly contribution, from finding the initial idea to submitting it for publication. Using a specification of all contributions/roles and attaching responsibilities to them makes the creation of the contribution more transparent.

 

This specification can take different forms:

  • via a written statement in one's own words, a so-called (author(ship)) contribution statement, whether or not in a predetermined format e.g. a form;
  • use of a predetermined classification of different (traditional and other) roles in a 'Contributor Roles Taxonomy' (e.g. CRediT);
  • use of digital badges where each contribution corresponds to a specific colored badge e.g. a red badge for writing the first draft. These types of digital visual badges take various forms and can often be added to personal profiles elsewhere on the Web.

 

Ghent University strongly recommends ‘contributorship disclosure'. The CRediT is registered and deposited in Biblio, the academic bibliography and repository of Ghent University.

Some journals impose a specific form for contributorship disclosure, while others leave it open-ended. So always check which guidelines and form apply.

 

The use of author roles allows researchers to define contributions to scholarly publishing much more broadly than traditional roles. They pay particular attention to specific categories such as patients and the public in health and social care research ('Patient & Public Involvement' - PPI) and seek appropriate support e.g. through the use of tools such as the de GRIPP2 Reporting checklist. Regarding collaboration researchers follow at least the TRUST Code - A Global Code of Conduct for Equitable Research Partnerships (Board of Governors 7/10/22).

 

More tools for contributorship disclosure

(written) https://www.epj.org/images/stories/faq/examples-of-author-contributions.pdf

(in a form) https://journals.sagepub.com/pb-assets/cmscontent/JSN/AUTHORSHIP%20CONTRIBUTION%20STATEMENT%20March%202019-1552409436010.pdf

 

Read the full ‘Policy on Authorship and recognition of contributions to scholarly publishing’. 

Researchers can address their questions to the faculty contact point for research integrity or the secretariat of the Commission for Research Integrity.

A complete overview of Research Integrity at Ghent University on the webpage

 

More tips

Translated tip


Last modified July 6, 2026, 1:43 p.m.